Some complain about cost, aesthetics of radio-read models
By Ray Gronberg
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
; 419-6648
DURHAM -- Contractors before the end of August had installed about 8,500 of the roughly 80,000 radio-read water meters Durham's Water Management Department intends to put in throughout the city.
The company the department chose for the opening phase of the upgrades, Vanguard Utility Service Inc., began work on July 1 and has until the end of the year to place 20,000 meters, said Vicki Westbrook, deputy director of water management.
The contract with Vanguard will cost the city up to $4.9 million. The work completed so far has mostly been in neighborhoods north of Interstate 85, Westbrook said.
Citywide, officials are expecting the long-planned upgrade to cost $19.8 million, according to Durham's capital improvement program. A combination of pay-as-you go money and loans are likely to cover the bill.
Vanguard will have to compete for the right to continue working past its current contract, as city officials plan to take new bids when follow-on phases are ready, Westbrook said.
Water Management officials pushed for the meter replacements as an efficiency measure.
Once the radio-read models are in, city employees will be able to read figures on customers' water usage from passing trucks, rather than having to get out and look at the meters.
That will save enough time that the city can move to a monthly billing cycle, in place of the once-every-two-months cycle it's on now. Water department officials believe the more frequent billings will encourage conservation.
Automated readings should help the city government avoid billing errors, like those that affected up to 11,000 customers earlier this year when officials discovered a meter reader had falsified some reports.
Officials also are projecting additional savings from reduced labor and fuel costs. Once the project's complete, they think they'll need only about a third of the positions and vehicles now assigned to meter-reading duties.
Going in, they needed 10 workers and 10 vehicles to do the job.
But the project has its detractors, among them Bill Anderson, a Duke Park activist.
Anderson said he doesn't think the meter replacements are worth the cost, particularly since they're likely to displace relatively low-skill jobs that officials could use to help the local economy.
He also said some installations are hurting community appearance. Outside some homes, the city's having to raise the meters 3 to 4 inches above ground to ensure a good signal.
Anderson is further worried that sloppy installation work could trigger plumbing problems.
He bases that on conversations with a plumber, Loren Webster, who told The Herald-Sun a meter upgrade may have helped break a water heater belonging to one of his customers.
Damage to water heaters is theoretically possible in older homes if workers put in special valves to prevent "backflow," a pressure change that sucks water from the home back into the city piping network.
Webster said he thinks a backflow valve tied to a new meter contributed to his customer's water-heater problem, by giving hot water as it expands nowhere to go but through the heater's own pop-off.
The escaping water trickled into the heater's electronics and shorted them out, he said.
City officials are aware of Webster's complaint but don't think his customer's new meter was responsible. Workers are not installing anti-backflow valves are part of the project, Westbrook said.
Another plumber who works in the area, Brown Brothers Plumbing & Heating Inc. President Rick Whitaker, said he and his staff haven't seen any cases like the one Webster reported.
But they have dealt with at least one repair to a lawn irrigation system a customer suspects can be traced to meter work.
Whitaker said that if a worker jiggles an irrigation system's PVC piping enough while replacing a meter, it's possible to dislodge a fitting in the irrigation system somewhere.
But in his customer's case, "I can't tell you right here right now whether [the meter work] caused it or not," Whitaker said.
He added that he does suspect city will get plenty of complaints about the above-ground meters, which result when supporting pipes are too close to ground level to allow workers to completely bury the new unit.
"I don't think the city has done a very good job of educating the consumer on that," Whitaker said.